- #M1 mac handbrake movie#
- #M1 mac handbrake upgrade#
- #M1 mac handbrake software#
- #M1 mac handbrake Pc#
Whatever the reason, you have physical media, but that’s just one copy. Perhaps they prefer the idea of owning the copy themselves and not having it pulled away due to a rights dispute, or perhaps they prefer the higher, consistent quality that physical media provides. But that is me and I am decidedly not an expert.While much of the world has embraced streaming, there are still many who have physical media. I can get small size and good quality but it runs slow. I can get things to run fast and the quality will be good, but the size will be large. The Macs I had before the M1 were old enough that they didn’t support hardware encoding so I don’t know how that works on the Intel machines.įrom my experience with encoding, there are 3 options: speed, quality, and size. If you use the Apple Toolbox encoder, there are a lot fewer options, and the encoding will be blazing fast because it is processed on the custom hardware. The only difference that I know of is that the M1 will be whisper quiet and the Intel fan will be a rocket. This is CPU limited, you would need a ton of cores to make this faster, so M1X would destroy Intels, but that doesn’t exist… yet. There won’t be a big difference between the M1 and Intel in terms of speed.
#M1 mac handbrake software#
If you use the software encoders, you have more options, and the entire encoding is done on the CPU. I think it will really depend on the video encoder that you use.
#M1 mac handbrake movie#
(But you're not going to stream Windows® Games on an iMac/MacBook, so if you want to render out a Movie you finished on your new Crapbook then Software-Encode would be the better way to go.) So all in all, Hardware-Encode Bad for Encoding final Projects, but good for Live-Streaming. Making far more assumptions, guesses, as to the information it's reading, and taking far less time in less accurately replicating it. It does so, partly, by taking far less time analyzing the source. Hardware encoding trades higher speeds for lower image quality and higher file sizes. Yes, you will be slower with the Swiss-Army knife (Software-Encode) but you definitively have more functions available for the Final Product to get it done. Imagine a GPU(HW-Encode) like a specialized knife to cut e.g. but in comparison Crap.Īnd yes, Nvenc (Nvidia) had some of the best hardware Encoders, but still, the Hardware Encoders have like 10% of the available functionsets of an Software Encoder. but not great to get an Final product to release on e.g. Hardware Encoding is good for Converting something on the Fly. (6) Less Number Of Functions Are Available (2) Very Good Performance in terms of Latency What Are Properties Of Hardware Encoding ? (6) More Number Of Functions Are AvailableĪnd the Following thing is the Point I wanna focus on:
#M1 mac handbrake upgrade#
(5) Easy to Upgrade results high scalability (4) CPU Based Encoding (GPU is not mandatory) (2) Medium Performance In terms of Latency What Are Properties Of Software Encoding ? In my experience, the M1 encodes and decodes significantly faster than basically any intel chip from the past few years (the 16" Pro, Mac Pro, and 27" iMac are faster but that is because of their AMD graphics being able to accelerate the process not because of any intel chip and even then the difference is not by as much as you would think).
#M1 mac handbrake Pc#
You might be able to get similar performance if you get a PC with a recent AMD or Nvidia graphics card (and make sure you configure handbrake to use GPU acceleration), however, that graphics card by itself is going to cost almost as much as a base M1 mini.Īs someone who edits a ton of video in DaVinci Resolve and Final Cut Pro, if handbrake is not performing better on the M1 chip than a 2018 Intel chip with integrated graphics, that sounds like an issue with handbrake not taking advantage of the new chipset. Last I saw any Apple Silicon chip (including those in iPads and iPhones) is able to encode and decode H.265 faster than anything from Intel.
0 kommentar(er)
